Your works cited page begins on a new page.
Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you. Any type of essay. Get your price writers online In early African-American literature, there is a consistent theme of gaining freedom through assimilation that as an idea slowly wilts and becomes militant as it continues to be ineffective in the black struggle for freedom and equality.
Phillis Wheatley is the first canonical African-American female poet and she is able to write in this time period because her poetry is the opposite of critical. Modernly it is an atheist habit to formulate philosophical and scientific argument against the basis of a Judeo-Christian god, this stems from the religious indoctrination perpetrated onto the masses in the early stages of America.
To argue against the societal restrictions and oppressions undergone by a specific populace, one must reveal the hypocrisy within Christianity from which the oppressor draws their morality.
By appealing to this base desire of self-righteousness, the overlord must cease to be the oppressor or admit that they are villainous. It is indicative that the value of Christianity to these people is a mechanism for adding value to a life that is insufficiently vibrant or full of exceptional things.
As a student of classical literature Wheatley was well acquainted with both Milton and Pope, and thus can be expected to view Christianity critically in regards to its application of oppression. This poem as well as a criticism works nicely as a satire to expose the fear within the community of slavers and subjugators in which she writes her work.
Wheatley uses satire to force acknowledgement of equality in the eyes of God by her keepers, and thus establishes a means to the reclamation of independence for future leaders invoking the same arguments, such as Olaudah and reverend King. In a nutshell, Wheatley markets herself to a predominantly white audience conditioned by the fact that she is conservative and Christian and thus malleable and inherently in service against her own best wishes.
Wheatley uses this platform both to shelter herself from those whom would judge her, as well as to attach a European style and motif to her work. This allows her the most possible freedom she can attain within her position as she is able to continue her education and publication with little ramification outside of literary criticism.
Participation in the canon of early American literature for an African American woman is monumental in the development of this country, and to consider her a satirist as well acknowledges the necessity of education for true equality in modern American society.
This is just a sample from a fellow student. Let our professionals create one just for you.College essay writing service Explain whether you think an autobiographical or fictional account by a slave (such as Phillis Wheatley and Olaudah Equiano) is more persuasive than a biographical or fictional account by a white author (such as John Gabriel Stedman or Aphra Behn).
We have examined a number of central African American figures in the class thus far: Olaudah Equiano, Frederick Douglass, Phyllis Wheatley, Sojourner Truth, Booker T. Washington, W.
E. B. Dubois, Ida B. Wells, and Marcus Garvey. A contributor to The Greenwood Encyclopedia of American Poets and Poetry, he is also the coeditor, with John C.
Shields, of New Essays on Phillis Wheatley. Category: Social Science The Interesting Narrative Of The Life Of Olaudah Equiano Or Gustavus Vassa.
Sep 07, · Both Olaudah Equiano and Phillis wheatly had a different view of slavery. It was different in the sense of tone and attitude. The poem that Phillis Wheatley wrote was adressed to someone if higher power. We have examined a number of central African American figures in the class thus far: Olaudah Equiano, Frederick Douglass, Phyllis Wheatley, Sojourner Truth, Booker T.
Washington, W. E. B.
Dubois, Ida B. Wells, and Marcus Garvey. Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African, Written by Himself (New York, this essay investigates the rhetorical and political stakes of a detail they quickly pass over: the “or” Cugoano, Phillis Wheatley, and Equiano/Vassa as making particular claims—.